9th Circuit Court Halts Judge's Order Returning National Guard Control to California Governor Newsom. A federal appeals court temporarily blocked a lower court ruling ordering President Trump to return control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles following immigration protests. The decision grants a stay pending a hearing on Tuesday, preventing the immediate return of troops to state control. The initial ruling deemed the deployment illegal, violating the Tenth Amendment and exceeding presidential authority
9th Circuit Court Blocks Judge's Order on National Guard Deployment: Hearing Set for Tuesday. The appeals court issued a temporary stay just hours before a federal judge's order to return control of National Guard troops to California Governor Newsom was to take effect Friday at noon. This follows a ruling that deemed President Trump's deployment illegal
Federal Judge Blocks Trump's National Guard Deployment to LA: A Tenth Amendment Violation? A US District Judge ruled President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles protests illegal, exceeding his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment. The ruling, temporarily blocked by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, specifically targeted the National Guard; the judge declined to rule on the deployment of Marines
9th Circuit Court Blocks Judge's Order: Trump Can Keep National Guard in California. A three-judge panel granted an administrative stay, temporarily halting a ruling that deemed the deployment illegal. The stay allows the National Guard to remain deployed for several more days while the appeals court reviews the case. #NationalGuard #California #Trump #9thCircuit #CourtDecision
California Governor Gavin Newsom lauded a federal judge's ruling blocking President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles during immigration protests. Newsom, who had petitioned the court for an emergency injunction, celebrated the initial decision as a victory for democracy before a subsequent appeals court stay
California Governor Newsom Celebrates Appeals Court Stay on National Guard Deployment: "A Test of Democracy, and We Passed
White House condemns unprecedented court order returning National Guard control to California, citing danger to federal officials. The order, blocking President Trump's deployment of the National Guard during Los Angeles protests, is deemed an overreach of authority
White House rejects court order blocking National Guard deployment in Los Angeles, calling it an abuse of power. Spokesperson Anna Kelly stated the President acted lawfully as Commander in Chief to protect federal personnel and buildings, and the Trump Administration will appeal the Ninth Circuit's temporary stay. The dispute centers on Governor Newsom's challenge to the President's authority to deploy the National Guard during Los Angeles protests
California National Guard Deployment Blocked: 700 Marines Train Amidst Legal Battle. A federal appeals court temporarily halted an order returning National Guard troops to California Governor Newsom's control following Los Angeles protests. The ruling comes as 700 Marines undergo civil disturbance training at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, with 140 poised to replace National Guard members in Los Angeles. This legal challenge centers on President Trump's authority to deploy the National Guard, raising Tenth Amendment concerns and sparking debate over the separation of powers
President Trump's authority to deploy the California National Guard under Title 10, bypassing the governor's typical command, faced legal challenge. A federal judge ruled the deployment illegal, violating the Tenth Amendment and exceeding presidential authority, prompting an immediate appeal and temporary stay by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
President's Authority to Deploy National Guard: Understanding Title 10 Title 10 of the U.S. Code outlines the President's limited authority to federalize National Guard troops. This power is invoked only under specific circumstances, including national invasion, rebellion, or when the President cannot enforce federal laws. Recent legal challenges highlight the ongoing debate surrounding this critical aspect of presidential power and the Posse Comitatus Act
9th Circuit Court Blocks Judge's Order: Trump Retains National Guard Control in Los Angeles. Judge Breyer's ruling deemed the deployment illegal, exceeding presidential authority and violating the Tenth Amendment; however, the appeals court issued a temporary stay, allowing the National Guard to remain in Los Angeles pending further review
Appeals Court Halts Judge's Block on Trump's National Guard Deployment to LA Protests; Judge deemed the deployment illegal, exceeding presidential authority, while the White House called the ruling unprecedented
California Governor Newsom legally challenged the federal government's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, arguing it violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded presidential authority. A subsequent emergency motion sought to prevent the Guard's involvement in immigration enforcement actions
California Governor Newsom challenges President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Arguing the deployment violated the Tenth Amendment and escalated tensions surrounding immigration raids, the Governor successfully secured a temporary court injunction blocking the Guard's assistance to immigration agents. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the case on Tuesday
California National Guard troops assisting federal immigration agents in Los Angeles: Approximately 500 Guard members have received training for immigration operations, as confirmed by Major General Scott Sherman, commander of Task Force 51. Images of National Guard soldiers supporting federal agents during these operations have been released by immigration officials. This deployment is currently under legal challenge
Marine Deployment to Immigration Raids: No Training, Uncertain Future
Federal Appeals Court Halts Judge's Order: Trump Retains National Guard Control in California. A federal judge's ruling deemed President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles following immigration protests unlawful, exceeding his authority and violating the Tenth Amendment. However, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary stay, allowing the President to maintain control pending further review
Legal challenge claims Title 10 requires presidential consultation with governors before National Guard deployment orders
Trump's National Guard Deployment: Legal Authority and 9th Circuit Appeal. A federal attorney argues President Trump acted within his legal authority by deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles, notifying the commanding general and possessing the power to call them in even without prior notification. This follows a federal judge's order blocking the deployment, an order subsequently stayed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals pending further review. The legal battle centers on the President's authority as Commander-in-Chief and the Tenth Amendment
Justice Department argues Trump's National Guard deployment order is unreviewable by courts, filing brief ahead of Thursday hearing
Federal court intervention in presidential deployment of the National Guard is unprecedented. The Department of Justice argues that, as with past deployments by Presidents Eisenhower and Nixon, judicial interference is unwarranted in this instance, citing the President's authority as Commander-in-Chief
9th Circuit Blocks Judge's Order: Trump Retains National Guard Control The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary stay, blocking a lower court's order to return control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles to California Governor Newsom. This decision allows President Trump to maintain control while the appeals court reviews the case
Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the Constitution, said he disagreed.
President Trump's authority to deploy National Guard troops challenged: A federal judge's order limiting the President's power, citing the Tenth Amendment and exceeding statutory authority, has been temporarily blocked by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The ruling highlights the crucial difference between a constitutional government and unchecked executive power, pending a full hearing
For 20 years, HuffPost has delivered fearless truth-telling journalism. Support our mission so we can continue investigating and reporting for the next 20. Your contribution keeps independent journalism alive
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth everyone deserves
Your support fuels our independent journalism. We're deeply grateful for your past contributions, which were vital in strengthening our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we need your continued support to keep delivering critical news coverage. Join us again today
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth everyone deserves
Your continued support fuels our vital journalism. We're incredibly thankful for your past contributions, which strengthened our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we need your help to continue delivering critical news coverage. Join us again today
Already submitted your contribution? Log in to dismiss these messages
For 20 years, HuffPost has delivered fearless truth-telling journalism. Support independent journalism and help us continue investigating critical issues for the next 20 years. Your contribution keeps our vital reporting alive
Already submitted your contribution? Log in to dismiss these messages
Trump's deployment of the National Guard to quell Los Angeles immigration raid protests sparked widespread outrage. Following the initial deployment, demonstrations intensified in LA and spread to major cities including Boston, Chicago, and Seattle. Legal challenges to the President's authority, including a temporary block by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, highlight the ongoing controversy surrounding the National Guard's role in immigration enforcement
Trump's stark depiction of Los Angeles clashes sharply with Mayor Karen Bass and Governor Newsom's assessment of the city's situation
Source: Original Article