Tesla Autopilot Faces $200 Million Verdict: Florida Jury Finds Tesla Partly Responsible for Deadly Crash. A Florida jury found Tesla's Autopilot system partially responsible for a fatal accident, awarding over $200 million to the victims' families. The verdict follows accusations of evidence tampering and raises concerns about the safety of self-driving technology
Tesla Autopilot Crash: $200M Verdict Highlights Safety Concerns. A federal jury found Tesla significantly responsible for a fatal Florida crash involving Autopilot, awarding over $200 million to the victims' families. The decision contrasts with Elon Musk's push for driverless taxi services and raises serious questions about Tesla's driver-assistance technology and data handling practices. This landmark ruling could impact future lawsuits against the automaker
Tesla Autopilot Found Partially Liable in $200M Fatal Crash Verdict: A Miami jury delivered a landmark $200 million verdict against Tesla, finding its Autopilot system partially responsible for a deadly Florida accident. This rare trial victory, following numerous dismissed or settled cases, sets a significant precedent and could embolden future lawsuits against the automaker. The four-year legal battle highlighted concerns about Tesla's data handling and the safety of its self-driving technology, particularly as Musk pushes for widespread driverless taxi service deployment
Tesla's $200M Autopilot Crash Verdict Opens Floodgates for Lawsuits: A Miami jury's decision holding Tesla partially responsible for a fatal Autopilot crash is expected to embolden numerous similar lawsuits against the electric car manufacturer, according to legal experts. The verdict, following a four-year battle and allegations of evidence tampering, could significantly impact Tesla's driverless taxi plans and its ongoing safety concerns
Tesla Autopilot Crash: $200M Verdict & Evidence Tampering Allegations. A Florida jury found Tesla partially liable for a fatal Autopilot crash, awarding over $200 million to the family of Naibel Benavides Leon (22) and her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. Lawyers alleged Tesla concealed or destroyed crucial pre-crash data and video evidence, a claim supported by a forensic expert who recovered the missing information. This landmark verdict could significantly impact future Tesla Autopilot lawsuits
Tesla's delayed release of crucial data in fatal Autopilot crash cases has faced intense scrutiny. In a recent $200 million verdict, plaintiffs proved Tesla possessed critical accident data—including video and vehicle logs—contrary to the company's claims. A forensic expert uncovered this evidence, prompting Tesla to admit an oversight. This landmark case, highlighting data transparency issues surrounding Tesla's Autopilot technology, could significantly impact future litigation
Tesla disputes $200M Autopilot crash verdict, arguing it unfairly hinders automotive safety advancements and wrongly blames the technology when the driver admitted fault. The company claims the plaintiffs' narrative ignores the driver's acknowledged responsibility for the Florida accident, jeopardizing the development of life-saving driver-assist features
Tesla Ordered to Pay $243 Million in Deadly Autopilot Crash: A Miami jury found Tesla partly liable for a fatal accident involving its Autopilot system, awarding $200 million in punitive damages and $43 million in compensatory damages. This landmark verdict follows a four-year legal battle and could significantly impact future Autopilot lawsuits
Tesla's Autopilot faces $200M+ verdict in deadly crash, raising safety concerns. A Miami jury found Tesla partly liable for a fatal accident, impacting Musk's plans for driverless taxis and potentially opening the floodgates for similar lawsuits. Financial analysts predict significant industry repercussions following this landmark ruling
Tesla to Appeal $200 Million Verdict in Autopilot Crash Case. Following a Florida jury's decision finding Tesla partially responsible for a fatal accident involving its Autopilot system, the company announced its intent to appeal the $200 million judgment. The verdict highlights concerns about Autopilot safety and data transparency
Tesla's Autopilot faces $200M verdict: Will the Miami jury's decision impact Tesla's safety reputation and upcoming driverless taxi service? A 2019 Florida crash involving Autopilot highlights concerns over technology failures and evidence handling, raising questions about Tesla's safety claims and future autonomous vehicle plans. The verdict could significantly impact future litigation against the company
Tesla's Autopilot Misleading Marketing Contributed to Fatal Crash, Jury Rules. A Miami jury awarded over $200 million in damages, finding Tesla partly responsible for a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver-assist system. The verdict highlights concerns about misleading marketing of Autopilot's capabilities, with evidence suggesting the system's limitations were downplayed, potentially endangering drivers. The case also exposed allegations of evidence tampering and underscores ongoing controversies surrounding Tesla's data handling practices in accident investigations
Automakers like Tesla use terms like "driver assist" and "co-pilot" to mitigate driver overreliance on advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). This cautious terminology highlights the ongoing need for driver attention and control, even with features like Autopilot
Tesla's misleading statements about Autopilot's safety and alleged evidence suppression contributed to a $200M verdict in a wrongful death lawsuit. This landmark case highlights the importance of accurate information and transparency in the autonomous vehicle industry
Tesla Autopilot Partially Blamed in Fatal Florida Crash, $200M Verdict: A Miami jury found Tesla partly responsible for a deadly crash involving its Autopilot system, awarding over $200 million to the victims. The verdict highlights the negligence of the driver, George McGee, who sped through a stop sign and intersection before colliding with a parked vehicle, but also emphasizes the failure of Tesla's technology. This landmark ruling follows allegations of evidence tampering and could significantly impact future Autopilot lawsuits
The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury.
But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on.
“I trusted the technology too much,” said McGee at one point in his testimony. “I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.”
The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cell phone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn’t crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: “The cause is that he dropped his cell phone.”
The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver’s admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.
__
Condon reported from New York.
__
Earlier versions of this story incorrectly reported that the jury ordered Tesla to pay $329 million and that the compensatory damages totaled $49 million.
Source: Original Article