Senate Parliamentarian Ruling Forces Republicans to Cut Big Beautiful Bill: Key Food Stamp Provision Rejected. A key element of the Republican "Big Beautiful Bill"—requiring states to share the cost of SNAP benefits—has been struck down by the Senate parliamentarian, forcing significant changes to the legislation. This decision impacts the bill's budget reconciliation process and jeopardizes its proposed tax cuts
Senate Parliamentarian Blocks State Cost-Sharing in Republican "Big Beautiful Bill," Dealing Major Setback to SNAP Cuts. Democrats successfully challenged a provision requiring states to share the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, preventing its inclusion under the fast-track budget reconciliation process. This key ruling eliminates significant cost savings Republicans planned to offset tax cuts for the wealthy, impacting over 20 million households receiving monthly food assistance
Senate Parliamentarian Blocks SNAP Cost-Sharing Provision in Republicans' "Big Beautiful Bill," a major setback for the GOP's plan to cut food assistance and offset tax cuts for the wealthy. The rejected proposal would have shifted billions in SNAP costs to states, impacting millions of households and undermining the program's structure. This ruling is a victory for Democrats who successfully argued against the provision, highlighting the fight against cuts to vital social programs
Senate Parliamentarian Rules Against Republican SNAP Cost-Sharing Provision: A major blow to the GOP's "Big Beautiful Bill," Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) celebrates the ruling, secured through Democrats' successful behind-closed-doors arguments. The decision forces Republicans to remove a key provision requiring states to share the cost of federal food benefits, impacting the bill's budget and jeopardizing tax cuts for the wealthy
Senate Democrats block key provision of Republicans' "Big Beautiful Bill," forcing a major setback for their plan to cut taxes for the wealthy while reducing food assistance for families. Senator Merkley vows continued opposition, highlighting the use of Senate rules to fight the bill's passage and protect vulnerable populations
Senate parliamentarian blocks GOP effort to force states to share costs of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a key provision in the "Big Beautiful Bill" that would have shifted 5% of the $100 billion annual cost to states, impacting over 20 million households. This decision prevents a major structural change to SNAP and eliminates significant projected savings ($128 billion over 10 years) intended to offset tax cuts for the wealthy. The House version, unlike the Senate's more limited approach, incentivized states to reduce SNAP enrollment
Senate Parliamentarian Blocks SNAP Cost-Sharing in Republicans' "Big Beautiful Bill," Jeopardizing Billions in Projected Savings. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the House proposal to require state cost-sharing for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits would save $128 billion over 10 years. However, the Senate's narrower approach, limited to states with high SNAP error rates, would likely yield significantly less savings. This setback impacts the bill's ability to offset proposed tax cuts
Both House and Senate versions of the Big Beautiful Bill retain stricter work requirements for able-bodied SNAP recipients and cap future benefit increases, despite a setback on state cost-sharing
Senate parliamentarian rules against Republican effort to shift SNAP costs to states, jeopardizing the "Big Beautiful Bill." Using budget reconciliation to bypass the 60-vote threshold, Republicans sought to include a provision requiring state cost-sharing for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. However, the Byrd Rule, which prohibits extraneous provisions, blocked this cost-saving measure, deemed incidental to its non-budgetary impact on state governments. This significant setback removes substantial savings intended to offset the bill's tax cuts
Senate Parliamentarian Ruling Threatens Key "Big Beautiful Bill" Provision: A state AI regulation ban, flagged for potential Byrd Rule violations, remains under review, jeopardizing another significant part of the Republican bill
For 20 years, HuffPost has been a fearless voice for truth. Support independent journalism and help us continue uncovering vital stories for the next 20! Your contribution keeps our investigative reporting alive
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth everyone deserves
Your support fuels our vital journalism. We're incredibly grateful for your past contributions, which strengthened our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we need your continued support to keep delivering critical news and analysis. Join us again today
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the news everyone deserves
Your support fuels our vital journalism. We're deeply grateful for your past contributions, which strengthened our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we need your continued support to keep delivering critical news and analysis. Join us again and help us continue our vital work
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
Source: Original Article