Pentagon Imposes Stricter Media Restrictions: Journalists Face New Pledge Requirement. Credentialed journalists at the Pentagon will now be required to sign a pledge barring the release of unauthorized information, including unclassified data, risking credential revocation for non-compliance. This new policy, detailed in a 17-page memo, intensifies media restrictions and sparks First Amendment concerns
Pentagon Tightens Media Restrictions: Journalists Face Credential Revocation for Unauthorized Reporting. A new 17-page memo implements stricter rules, requiring journalists to sign a pledge against releasing unapproved information, even unclassified data. Violation risks Pentagon access loss, sparking press freedom concerns
Pentagon Tightens Media Restrictions: Journalists Required to Sign Non-Disclosure Pledge. A new Pentagon directive mandates that credentialed media sign a pledge to only release authorized information, including unclassified data, before publication. Violation risks Pentagon access revocation. This policy, detailed in a 17-page memo, strengthens media restrictions and sparks First Amendment concerns
Pentagon's New Media Restrictions Spark Freedom of the Press Concerns: A 17-page memo mandates journalists sign a non-disclosure agreement, restricting access to unclassified information. Critics call this an assault on independent journalism and a troubling escalation of government pressure on the American media under the Trump administration. The policy, requiring pre-approval for all releases, even unclassified information, raises concerns about censorship and the public's right to know
Pentagon's New Media Restrictions Spark Freedom of the Press Concerns: National Press Club President Mike Balsamo, also National Law Enforcement Editor at the Associated Press, warns that government pre-approval of military news equates to censorship, delivering only the official narrative and jeopardizing independent reporting. This alarming development should concern all Americans
Pentagon Tightens Media Restrictions: Secretary Hegseth Announces New Rules for Journalists. Former Fox News personality and current Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced stricter Pentagon press credentials, requiring journalists to sign a non-disclosure pledge. The new policy, limiting access to unclassified information, sparks First Amendment concerns
Pentagon Tightens Media Access: Secretary Hegseth defends new rules requiring journalists to adhere to strict guidelines and obtain authorization before releasing any information, classified or unclassified. He emphasizes that the public, not the press, controls the Pentagon, and access requires following security protocols
Pentagon Tightens Press Restrictions: Increased Security Measures Limit Reporter Access and Mandate Pre-Approval for Information Release. News organizations face stricter access rules, including mandatory escorts and a pledge to avoid reporting unauthorized information, even if unclassified, sparking concerns about press freedom and government transparency
Pentagon Security Breach Under Hegseth: A Signal messaging mishap during Secretary Hegseth's early tenure revealed sensitive military strike plans in Yemen to The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg. Mike Waltz, Trump's former national security advisor, accepted responsibility, leading to a job reassignment. This incident highlights increased Pentagon media restrictions under the current administration
Pentagon Leak Embarrasses Trump Administration: Elon Musk's Near-War Briefing and Subsequent Pentagon Investigation. Following a New York Times leak revealing a planned military briefing for Elon Musk on US-China war contingency plans, then-President Trump intervened, halting the briefing and prompting Secretary Hegseth to suspend two Pentagon officials. This incident fueled increased Pentagon media restrictions and a new policy requiring journalists to sign non-disclosure agreements
Pentagon's New Media Restrictions Condemned: SPJ Calls Policy "Alarming
Pentagon's New Media Restrictions Spark First Amendment Concerns: A new Pentagon policy requiring journalists to pre-approve all reporting, even unclassified information, is drawing fierce criticism as a blatant attempt at censorship and a dangerous violation of press freedom. This restrictive measure, escalating existing media limitations, threatens independent journalism and public access to vital information. Critics argue it represents a disturbing pattern of government hostility towards transparency and democratic norms
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray criticizes new Pentagon media restrictions as detrimental to the American public, calling the policy counter to the public interest. The policy, requiring journalists to pledge against releasing unauthorized information—even unclassified data—risks chilling independent reporting and limiting public access to crucial information
Protect press freedom: The Trump administration's escalating attacks on the media threaten truth and transparency. Join us now to safeguard independent journalism before it's silenced. Support investigative reporting
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth, regardless of pressure. We provide independent journalism, ensuring everyone has access to unbiased news
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
“The Constitution protects the right to report on the activities of democratically elected and appointed government officials,” Murray said. “Any attempt to control messaging and curb access by the government is counter to the First Amendment and against the public interest.”
Source: Original Article