Karen Read Murder Trial: Jurors and Lead Investigator Speak Out After Not Guilty Verdict. Following a not-guilty verdict in the high-profile Karen Read murder trial, jurors and lead investigator Michael Proctor have given post-trial interviews, sparking renewed debate. The case, involving the death of Boston police officer John O'Keefe, saw Read acquitted of murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene charges. Controversy surrounds Proctor, fired for misconduct, and accusations of a cover-up
Karen Read's Not Guilty Verdict: Juror Testimony and Police Controversy. The high-profile trial of Karen Read, 45, accused of second-degree murder in the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, ended with a not-guilty verdict on murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene charges. While found guilty of OUI (operating under the influence), the case sparked controversy, fueled by juror statements questioning the investigation led by now-fired lead investigator Michael Proctor, whose conduct is under scrutiny. Read's supporters allege a potential cover-up, claims Proctor vehemently denies. The conflicting accounts and the sealing of juror identities highlight the intense debate surrounding this tragic incident
Karen Read's not-guilty verdict sparks controversy, with focus on lead investigator Michael Proctor. Defense attorneys claimed Proctor's bias against Read influenced the investigation from its outset. Subsequently fired by the Massachusetts State Police for sending defamatory text messages about Read, Proctor faces accusations of a cover-up and framing the defendant. Read's supporters echo these claims, while Proctor vehemently denies any wrongdoing, calling the accusations "ridiculous." The case highlights concerns about investigative integrity and its impact on the trial's outcome
In a "Dateline" NBC interview, lead investigator Michael Proctor vehemently denies accusations of framing Karen Read for the murder of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. He dismisses claims of tampering with Read's taillight as "absolutely not true" and "ridiculous," citing a complete lack of evidence supporting these allegations
Lead investigator Michael Proctor vehemently denies accusations of framing Karen Read, calling claims of tampering with evidence, such as the alleged taillight break, "ridiculous" and completely unsupported by facts. He insists there's no evidence to substantiate these allegations, stating they simply did not occur
Karen Read Not Guilty Verdict: Juror Names Sealed Amid Safety Concerns; Juror Disputes Collision and Evidence Planting Claims. Following Read's acquittal on murder charges in the John O'Keefe case, a juror, identified only as "Jason," spoke out, refuting claims of a collision and evidence tampering by investigators. The judge sealed juror identities citing safety concerns
Juror casts doubt on Karen Read murder trial investigation, citing "a lot of holes" and questioning potential cover-up. Concerns raised about lead investigator's conduct and alleged bias fuel speculation of mishandled evidence in the high-profile case
Juror Paula Prado reveals a shift in her perspective during the Karen Read murder trial. Initially believing Read was guilty of manslaughter, Prado ultimately changed her opinion over the three-week deliberation process. This revelation follows a not-guilty verdict and ongoing controversy surrounding lead investigator Michael Proctor
Juror doubts and investigator controversy emerge in Karen Read's not-guilty verdict. A juror revealed inconsistencies in the prosecution's case against Read, questioning the evidence linking her to the collision with John O'Keefe. This follows the lead investigator's dismissal and accusations of bias, raising concerns about the integrity of the investigation. The case highlights the conflicting accounts surrounding the incident and the subsequent trial
Juror Janet Jimenez reveals doubts about the Karen Read murder investigation, citing inconsistencies that led to her not-guilty verdict. Her statement to WCVB-TV, alongside comments from other jurors, casts further scrutiny on lead investigator Michael Proctor, whose conduct has been heavily criticized
Juror reveals initial bias toward guilt in Karen Read murder trial, despite not-guilty verdict. A juror's statement highlights the complexities of the case, revealing an initial leaning towards guilt before deliberations. This insight follows the controversial not-guilty verdict for Read, charged with second-degree murder in the death of Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The case, marked by accusations of police misconduct and a lead investigator's controversial texts, continues to generate intense public interest
Massachusetts State Police offer condolences to the family of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe following the not-guilty verdict in Karen Read's murder trial. The department acknowledges the challenges of the past three years and its commitment to enhanced accountability and oversight
Massachusetts State Police Colonel Geoffrey Noble affirms the department's commitment to providing professional, trustworthy police services, emphasizing continued improvements under his leadership
Karen Read's not-guilty verdict in the John O'Keefe murder trial sparks controversy, with jurors, state police, and lead investigator Michael Proctor weighing in. Following the verdict, Read declared her commitment to justice for O'Keefe, stating, "No one has fought harder for justice for John O'Keefe than I have." This statement follows public comments from jurors and Proctor himself, who addressed accusations of bias and misconduct during the investigation
Karen Read's acquittal: Father expresses relief after daughter's release from wrongful murder charges. Bill Read, Karen's father, shared his immense relief following the not-guilty verdict in his daughter's high-profile murder trial, praising their successful fight against the power of the state and affirming his unwavering belief in her innocence
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
Some of the key witnesses in the trial also released a joint statement Wednesday in which they called the not guilty ruling a “devastating miscarriage of justice.”
The joint statement was issued by several people including Brian Albert, who owned the home where the party took place, and Jennifer McCabe, Albert’s sister-in-law, who was with Read and O’Keefe on the night of O’Keefe’s death.
Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey said only: “The jury has spoken.”
Source: Original Article