New Hampshire Trial: AI Robocalls, Voter Suppression, and the First-in-the-Nation Primary – A Political Consultant faces decades in prison for allegedly using AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden to suppress votes in the 2024 New Hampshire primary. The trial will also examine the validity of the state's primary status
New Hampshire Political Consultant Faces Decades in Prison for AI-Generated Robocalls Aimed at Voter Suppression. Steven Kramer, facing trial for voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, admits orchestrating AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden, sent to thousands two days before the January 23, 2024, primary. The calls urged voters to skip the primary, raising questions about the legality and impact of AI in political campaigns
AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden's voice, using his signature phrase "What a bunch of malarkey," falsely claimed voting in the New Hampshire primary would invalidate November ballots. This voter suppression tactic, orchestrated by political consultant Steven Kramer, is the focus of his upcoming trial, where he faces decades in prison for impersonating a candidate and potentially undermining the first-in-the-nation primary
AI-generated robocalls urged voters to "save their vote" for the November general election, claiming their ballots mattered more in November than in the January primary. This strategy, employed by a political consultant facing voter suppression charges, is central to his upcoming trial
New Hampshire political consultant Steven Kramer faces trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden. Kramer, who runs a get-out-the-vote firm, claims his actions, involving a $150 AI voice created by a New Orleans magician, weren't meant to sway the primary but to expose AI's potential for voter suppression. He argues his actions ultimately benefit democracy
Facing decades in prison for voter suppression, political consultant Steven Kramer defends his AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden, claiming his actions, though potentially villainous, ultimately aimed to improve American democracy by exposing AI's dangers in elections
New Hampshire's 2024 Presidential Primary: Prosecutors Block Defense Argument on DNC Sanction. Ahead of trial, prosecutors prevented Steven Kramer, accused of AI-generated robocall voter suppression, from claiming the unsanctioned primary was a meaningless straw poll. Despite the DNC's removal of New Hampshire from its early primary slot at President Biden's request (later rescinded), Biden won the state as a write-in candidate
New Hampshire AI Robocall Trial: Judge Allows DNC Relevance, Primary Date Confirmed. A political consultant faces voter suppression charges for AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden. The judge ruled the DNC's actions are relevant to the defendant's motive, despite the state's objections. While the court accepts the January 23, 2024 primary date as fact, jurors will independently consider its significance in determining guilt or innocence
New Hampshire political consultant Steven Kramer faces trial on serious charges: 11 felonies for voter suppression, each carrying a seven-year sentence, and 11 misdemeanors for impersonating a candidate, each with a one-year maximum. These charges stem from AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden, allegedly designed to deter voters from participating in the 2024 primary
Facing decades in prison for voter suppression, political consultant Steven Kramer's trial begins Thursday. He's admitted to sending AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden, but claims it was a warning about AI dangers, not an attempt to influence the New Hampshire primary. Adding to his legal troubles, Kramer has an outstanding $6 million fine from the Federal Communications Commission, with the FCC's payment status currently unconfirmed
Support HuffPost's fearless pursuit of truth for 20 more years. For two decades, we've delivered unwavering news; your support ensures we continue this vital mission. Help us keep independent journalism alive
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth everyone deserves
Your support fuels our vital journalism. We're incredibly grateful for your past contributions, which strengthened our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we need your continued support to keep delivering crucial news coverage. Join us again today
Unwavering commitment to factual journalism: delivering the truth everyone deserves
We need your continued support! Your past contributions were vital, strengthening our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we rely on your generosity to keep delivering crucial news and impactful journalism. Please join us again today
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
The agency was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but has since shown signs of a possible shift toward loosening regulations. In April, it recommended that a telecom company be added back to an industry consortium just weeks after the agency had proposed fining the company for its role in illegal robocalls impersonating the FCC.
Half of all U.S. states have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, according to the watchdog organization Public Citizen.
But House Republicans in Congress recently added a clause to their party’s signature “big beautiful” tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade, though it faces long odds in the Senate.
Source: Original Article