Bed Bath & Beyond's Revival Bypasses California: High Costs Prompt Expansion Strategy Shift. Executive Chairman Marcus Lemonis cites excessive regulations, taxes, and wages as reasons for avoiding California market entry, despite plans to open 300 new stores nationwide in the next two years. The company's strategic decision prioritizes profitable growth, focusing on states with a more business-friendly environment
Bed Bath & Beyond's CEO, Marcus Lemonis, explains why the revived retailer is avoiding California: the state's high taxes, excessive regulations, and high operating costs create an unsustainable business environment. This practical decision, not a political one, prioritizes profitability and reflects the challenges businesses face in California's complex regulatory landscape
Bed Bath & Beyond avoids California due to excessive taxes, fees, wages, and restrictive regulations, prioritizing profitability and common-sense business practices. The company's strategic decision reflects a broader challenge for businesses facing high operating costs in the state
Bed Bath & Beyond's return faces a California hurdle. CEO Marcus Lemonis cites California's high taxes, regulations, and operating costs as reasons for avoiding the state, despite plans to open 300 new stores nationwide. Governor Newsom's office responded on X, expressing surprise at the company's revival and wishing them success in their efforts to regain market relevance
Bed Bath & Beyond's revitalization plan includes opening 300 new stores nationwide in the next two years, starting with a new location in Nashville, TN. This expansion, announced by CEO Marcus Lemonis on Fox News' The Big Money Show, excludes California due to high costs and overregulation
Bed Bath & Beyond's strategic expansion: Bypassing California's high costs. Facing high taxes, regulations, and operating expenses, Bed Bath & Beyond CEO Marcus Lemonis announced the company will focus its 300-store, 24-month expansion plan outside of California. The decision, deemed a practical business strategy rather than a political one, reflects the challenges of operating profitably in a complex and costly environment. The company will instead serve California customers online
Bed Bath & Beyond's Comeback: From Bankruptcy to 300 New Stores (Excluding California). Before its 2023 bankruptcy, the retailer operated nearly 365 stores, with California having the most. After Overstock.com acquired its intellectual property, the resurrected Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (BBBY) is now planning to open 300 new locations within 24 months, excluding California due to high costs. Despite revenue declines from $1.6 billion in 2023 to $1.4 billion in 2024 and continued drops in the first half of 2025, operating losses have decreased, signaling a potential turnaround. The company's decision to avoid California highlights the challenges businesses face in the state's regulatory environment
Bed Bath & Beyond's Resurgence: New Stores, Strategic Partnerships, and Market Expansion. The Brand House Collective (formerly Kirkland's, KIRK, now TBHC) is partnering exclusively with Bed Bath & Beyond (BB&B) to operate smaller format BB&B and BuyBuy Baby stores nationwide. This strategic alliance follows TBHC's rebranding and includes the conversion of existing Kirkland's Home stores to Bed Bath & Beyond Home locations, starting in Nashville, TN, with four additional Nashville stores planned. This concentrated expansion in Tennessee allows for close management and streamlined processes for future store conversions. While TBHC boasts 313 stores across 35 states (including significant presence in Texas, Florida, and Georgia), Bed Bath & Beyond strategically avoids California due to high operating costs. Despite a 6% revenue decline to $441 million in fiscal 2024 from $469 million in 2023, BB&B plans to open 300 new stores within 24 months
Following Bed Bath & Beyond's decision to avoid California's high costs, many companies have already relocated their headquarters to Texas, including Tesla, SpaceX, Oracle, Hewlett Packard, Charles Schwab, CBRE Group, McKesson, Chevron, Palantir Technologies, AECOM, FICO, Realtor.com, and John Paul Mitchell Systems. This exodus highlights California's challenging business environment, characterized by high taxes, regulations, and operating costs
.
Source: Original Article