Appeals Court Allows Trump Administration to Freeze Billions in Foreign Aid: A divided D.C. Circuit court ruled the Trump administration can suspend congressionally appropriated foreign aid funding, partially overturning a lower court order. The majority opinion found that grant recipients lacked standing to challenge the freeze, while a dissenting judge cited Supreme Court precedent against presidential overreach
US Appeals Court Upholds Trump Administration's Foreign Aid Freeze: A 2-1 ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals denies a preliminary injunction sought by grant recipients challenging President Trump's executive order suspending billions in foreign aid funding. The majority opinion found the plaintiffs lacked sufficient legal grounds, while the dissenting judge argued the President overstepped his authority
Trump's Foreign Aid Freeze Upheld: Appeals Court Rules Against Injunction. On his second term's first day, President Trump issued an executive order freezing billions in congressionally appropriated foreign aid, impacting State Department and USAID funding. A divided appeals court panel now allows the administration to proceed with the suspension, rejecting grant recipients' challenge for a preliminary injunction
Federal Judge Orders Release of Frozen Foreign Aid: A US District Court judge overruled the Trump administration's freeze on billions of dollars in congressionally appropriated foreign aid for fiscal year 2024, following a lawsuit by grant recipients. The ruling, however, was later partially overturned by a divided appeals court
Appeals Court Partially Overturns Ruling on Trump's Foreign Aid Freeze. A majority of judges vacated a lower court order that blocked the Trump administration's suspension of billions in congressionally appropriated foreign aid, finding the plaintiffs lacked legal standing. The decision did not address the constitutionality of the executive order
Appeals Court Upholds Trump Administration's Foreign Aid Freeze: A divided D.C. Circuit panel ruled that grant recipients lacked standing to challenge the Trump administration's suspension of congressionally appropriated foreign aid funds. Judges Henderson and Katsas rejected the plaintiffs' claims, finding insufficient legal basis for the court's intervention, without addressing the constitutionality of the executive order itself. The ruling partially vacated a lower court order mandating the release of funds
Appeals court affirms Trump administration's authority to freeze foreign aid, rejecting grant recipients' request for a preliminary injunction. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to meet the necessary legal requirements, rendering the dispute over the district court's remedy moot
Appeals Court Upholds Trump Administration's Foreign Aid Freeze: Judge's Dissent Highlights Presidential Authority Limits. A divided D.C. Circuit Court ruled the Trump administration can freeze billions in foreign aid, rejecting a lower court order. One judge's dissent emphasized the Supreme Court's clear precedent against presidential law-breaking for policy reasons
HuffPost: 20 Years of Fearless Journalism. For two decades, we've relentlessly pursued truth. Support our mission and help us continue uncovering critical stories for the next 20 years. Your contribution keeps independent journalism alive
Unwavering Truth: 20 Years of Fact-Based Journalism. We deliver the news you deserve, providing fearless and relentless reporting, just like we have for the past two decades. Support our mission to keep independent journalism alive
Fueling 20 Years of Fearless Journalism: Your Support Matters Now More Than Ever. Your past contributions strengthened HuffPost during challenging times, helping us deliver unwavering truth. To continue our vital reporting for the next 20 years, we need your support. Join us again and help us keep the truth alive
Unwavering Truth: Fact-Based Journalism You Can Trust. For 20 years, we've delivered fearless reporting. Support our mission to keep independent journalism alive
Fueling 20 Years of Fearless Journalism: Your Support Keeps HuffPost Strong. Your past contributions were vital, helping us navigate challenging times and deliver unwavering truth. Now, more than ever, we need your support to continue our crucial investigative reporting. Join us again to ensure HuffPost remains a beacon of independent journalism for the next 20 years
Already donated? Log in to dismiss these messages
Appeals court majority ruling allows Trump administration to freeze foreign aid, defying Congress and potentially violating separation of powers. A dissenting judge argues the decision misinterprets precedent, enabling executive overreach and circumventing judicial review of unconstitutional actions. This ruling impacts billions in congressionally appropriated funds and raises serious concerns about executive power
The money at issue includes nearly $4 billion for USAID to spend on global health programs and more than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs. Trump has portrayed the foreign aid as wasteful spending that does not align with his foreign policy goals.
Henderson was nominated to the court by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Katsas was nominated by Trump. Pan was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden.
Source: Original Article