Immigrants' rights advocates file nationwide class-action lawsuit against Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, following Supreme Court ruling limiting nationwide injunctions. The ACLU and Legal Defense Fund challenge the order's constitutionality, arguing it violates Supreme Court precedent and congressional intent. This strategic lawsuit, filed on behalf of affected children and parents, utilizes a legal pathway opened by the Supreme Court's decision
ACLU-led class-action lawsuit challenges Trump's unconstitutional birthright citizenship executive order, arguing it violates the Constitution, Congress's intent, and Supreme Court precedent. The suit, filed on behalf of affected babies and their parents, follows the Supreme Court's decision limiting nationwide injunctions, offering a new legal path to fight the administration's actions
This nationwide class-action lawsuit, filed by the ACLU and other groups, directly challenges President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order. Following the Supreme Court's decision limiting nationwide injunctions, this lawsuit represents a strategic legal response, establishing a new pathway for challenging the administration's actions and protecting affected families. The suit argues the executive order violates the Constitution, congressional intent, and Supreme Court precedent
Supreme Court Curbs Nationwide Injunctions Against Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order, Prompting Immediate Class-Action Lawsuit. The 6-3 decision limits injunction relief to individual plaintiffs, impacting pro-democracy groups and prompting the ACLU to file a nationwide class action lawsuit challenging the executive order's constitutionality. This legal strategy follows sharp criticism from constitutional experts who deem the court's ruling a major setback
Following the Supreme Court's partial block on nationwide injunctions against President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, the ACLU and allied organizations immediately filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit. This strategic legal challenge, on behalf of affected babies and their parents, alleges unconstitutional actions by the Trump administration, circumventing the court's limitations on broader injunctions
Following the Supreme Court's decision limiting nationwide injunctions against President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, a new class-action lawsuit seeks to protect children potentially left vulnerable. Filed by the ACLU, Legal Defense Fund, and others, this lawsuit challenges the executive order's constitutionality, arguing it violates established precedent and congressional intent. While previous lawsuits secured nationwide injunctions, the Supreme Court's ruling narrowed their scope, prompting this crucial legal action to safeguard affected families
ACLU Files Nationwide Class-Action Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order. Following the Supreme Court's decision limiting nationwide injunctions, the ACLU and partners launched this lawsuit to protect children's citizenship rights, arguing the executive order is unconstitutional and violates established legal precedent. Lead attorney Cody Wofsy stated that every court previously reviewing the order deemed it unconstitutional, and this action ensures President Trump cannot infringe upon the citizenship rights of any child
Read the Nationwide Class-Action Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin, a former constitutional law professor, condemned the Supreme Court's decision limiting nationwide injunctions. He accurately predicted the subsequent ACLU class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's birthright citizenship executive order, a legal strategy now being employed by public interest groups to combat the order's unconstitutional restrictions on birthright citizenship
Supreme Court Curbs Nationwide Injunctions, Sparking Class-Action Lawsuit Against Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order. Following a 6-3 decision limiting nationwide injunctions against unconstitutional executive actions, a class-action lawsuit challenges President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, arguing it violates the Constitution and harms the rights of all Americans. The ruling, criticized by legal experts, prompted immediate action from civil rights groups seeking alternative legal avenues to protect affected individuals
For 20 years, HuffPost has been a fearless voice for truth. Support independent journalism and help us continue investigating critical issues for the next 20 years. Your contribution keeps our vital reporting alive
Unwavering commitment to factual, unbiased journalism for all
Your continued support fuels our vital reporting. We're deeply grateful for your past contributions, which strengthened our newsroom during challenging times. Now, more than ever, we need your help to continue delivering critical news and analysis. Please join us again
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth everyone deserves
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
“This might provide some temporary psychological relief for President Trump,” said the Maryland congressman, “but it will prove to be a staggering political liability over the next year as people show up to every district court in the land making the same slam-dunk arguments that have prevailed everywhere they have been raised and also, almost certainly, bring a nationwide class action suit against this lawlessness.”
Raskin noted that four U.S. district courts and three U.S. appeals courts have all found Trump’s executive order to be “a blatant violation” of the 14th Amendment.
“Judge John C. Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan-appointee, said it was the easiest case he had decided in more than four decades on the bench,” he said. “Not a single court in the land has upheld the Executive Order.”
Source: Original Article