Medvedev's Claim of Nuclear Warhead Supply to Iran After US Strikes Questioned by Analysts. Following Pentagon bunker-buster strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev alleged multiple countries planned to supply Iran with nuclear warheads. Experts, however, cast doubt on this claim, citing the logistical and treaty-related complexities of transferring nuclear weapons technology and the violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Medvedev Claims Countries Will Supply Iran with Nuclear Warheads: Russia's former president and Putin aide downplayed damage to Iranian nuclear sites following US strikes, claiming unspecified countries would provide Tehran with nuclear weapons. Experts cast doubt on this assertion, citing the logistical and treaty complexities involved in transferring nuclear warheads
Pentagon assesses damage after striking Iranian nuclear sites with 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators and Tomahawk missiles. Following Saturday's strikes, the Pentagon cautiously reported ongoing assessment of the destruction inflicted on Iranian nuclear facilities. This comes amid doubt cast on claims by Dmitry Medvedev regarding potential nuclear warhead transfers to Iran
Medvedev Claims US Strikes on Iran Risk Nuclear Proliferation: Following recent Pentagon strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Dmitry Medvedev alleges that several unnamed countries are prepared to supply Iran with nuclear warheads, escalating the conflict. This claim, however, is disputed by nuclear weapons analysts who highlight the logistical and treaty-related complexities involved in such transfers
Nuclear weapons experts dismiss former Russian President Medvedev's claim that multiple countries plan to supply Iran with nuclear warheads, citing the logistical and treaty-violation complexities of such transfers. Analysts highlight the intricate systems and specialized training required for safe handling and maintenance of nuclear weapons, deeming Medvedev's statement incredible
Nuclear weapons transfer: expert debunks Medvedev's claim. A UN disarmament researcher dismisses the notion that countries would easily supply nuclear warheads to Iran, citing the complex nature of nuclear weapons systems. These aren't simple bombs; deployment requires extensive training, specialized facilities, and sophisticated maintenance, making simple transfers impossible and violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Even tactical nuclear weapons necessitate advanced storage and handling. The claim, therefore, lacks credibility
Deploying nuclear warheads requires a complex system: trained personnel, specialized maintenance facilities, and sophisticated equipment. Even tactical nuclear weapons, despite their smaller yield and increased portability, necessitate secure, high-level storage and ongoing maintenance. This intricate infrastructure makes the transfer of nuclear weapons to another nation highly improbable
Transferring nuclear weapons requires a comprehensive nuclear program. Simply providing warheads to another nation, as claimed by Dmitry Medvedev regarding Iran, is impractical. Nuclear weapons are complex systems needing specialized personnel, maintenance, and infrastructure—a fact defying the notion of a simple transfer and violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Transferring nuclear warheads violates the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, a pact signed by Russia and China. Unlike conventional weapons, nuclear warheads require extensive infrastructure, trained personnel, and maintenance—making simple transfers impossible. This is true for both US nuclear weapons stationed in Europe and Russia's in Belarus, where custody remains with the respective nations
Nuclear weapons expert Pavel Podvig dismisses Dmitry Medvedev's claim that countries are supplying Iran with nuclear warheads as technically infeasible. Podvig, a senior researcher at the UN Institute for Disarmament Research, explains that nuclear weapons are complex systems requiring extensive training, maintenance, and infrastructure—not simply transferable items. Such a transfer would also violate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Medvedev's claim that multiple countries would supply Iran with nuclear warheads is doubted by experts. According to Adam Lowther, Vice President of Research at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies, Medvedev's statement likely refers to only three specific nations. This casts further doubt on the credibility of Russia's claims following recent Pentagon strikes on Iranian nuclear sites
US adversaries Russia, China, and North Korea – the only nuclear powers considered rivals to the US – understand that supplying Iran with nuclear weapons, even for deterrence, would provoke extreme escalation from the US and Israel
Nuclear proliferation fears escalate following claims that unnamed countries may supply Iran with nuclear warheads. Experts question the feasibility of such transfers, citing the complex technological and logistical requirements for handling and maintaining nuclear weapons, violations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the inherent risks of handing over such devastating power. The potential consequences of Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon—use or loss—highlight the gravity of the situation
Iran Nuclear Weapons: Expert Explains Traceability of Fissile Material. American forensics could easily trace the origin of an Iranian nuclear weapon, even one built with foreign materials, by analyzing its fissile material and design. This undermines claims of foreign nuclear warhead supply to Iran
Medvedev's claim that countries would supply Iran with nuclear warheads after US strikes is doubted by experts. Analysts dismiss the feasibility, citing the complex nature of nuclear weapons systems and the violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Any country providing such weapons would face severe US retaliation
Medvedev has been known to make bold, hawkish statements toward Ukraine and the US since the outset of the full-scale Russian invasion. He serves as the deputy chairman — second in rank to Putin — of the Kremlin’s security council.
His rhetoric has often run parallel to the Kremlin’s nuclear threats, repeatedly issued as warnings to the West over military aid to Ukraine. Moscow, however, has consistently not followed through with those threats, even when the US escalated its level of assistance to Kyiv.
Lowther said he believed Medvedev’s statement was a play against Ukraine, a bid to reduce the West’s willingness to help Kyiv.
“The Russians say: ‘You know what? You give the Ukrainians these weapons? Well, we can give the Iranians weapons as well,'” he said.
The Israel Defense Forces declined to comment on Medvedev’s remarks.
The White House and US State Department didn’t respond to requests for comment sent outside regular business hours by BI.
Source: Original Article