Trump Orders Iran Strikes, Suggests Path to Peace: Following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear targets, President Trump offered a surprising call for peace with Iran, defying expert predictions of retaliation and jeopardizing recent diplomatic efforts. The President's address, alongside key cabinet members, marked a significant escalation in the ongoing Middle East conflict
Trump's surprise airstrikes on Iran: Defying expert predictions of Iranian retaliation, President Trump declared a path to peace while simultaneously threatening further, more devastating attacks. His address, following US military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, sparked international concern and cast doubt on any future US-Iran agreements. Experts warn of increased regional instability and a diminished chance of diplomatic solutions
President Trump Issues Ultimatum to Iran After US Strikes: Peace or Greater Consequences. Following US military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, President Trump, alongside Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Rubio, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth, delivered a stark warning to Iran, demanding peace or facing significantly more devastating repercussions. The President's address followed the first direct US attacks on Iranian nuclear assets, escalating the ongoing conflict
Trump's cryptic four-minute address on the Iran strikes lacked strategic clarity and raised concerns. The momentous decision, the most consequential foreign policy move of his second term, offered no explanation for the US military action against Iranian nuclear sites. His comments, including seemingly contradictory statements and an unusual invocation of God, fueled anxieties about further US military escalation in the Middle East and the potential for Iranian retaliation
President Trump declared US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites a resounding military success, escalating the conflict with Iran and defying expert predictions of retaliation
Assessing the damage to Iran's nuclear program after US and Israeli strikes is extremely challenging. Ground troop deployment or international inspections are currently the only viable assessment methods, both highly improbable given heightened tensions. Further attacks, spurred by Iranian retaliation, could render inspections virtually impossible, significantly hindering damage assessment efforts
Waseda University's Professor Abdullah Baabood warns of Iranian retaliation following US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. A limited US attack, he told HuffPost, would likely provoke significant, escalatory countermeasures, jeopardizing de-escalation efforts
Trump's Iran Strikes Deepen Nuclear Deal Uncertainty: Saturday's military action against Iranian nuclear sites, conducted in coordination with Israel, fuels suspicions that the President's commitment to diplomacy is a façade. His remarks praising the US-Israel partnership and suggesting future attacks could be far greater, raise concerns of escalating conflict and further jeopardize any potential nuclear agreement. Experts predict Iranian retaliation and diminished trust in future negotiations
Iran's potential retaliation against Israel: Expert analysis following recent Israeli military actions in Lebanon and Syria highlights Iran's growing need for deterrence. Professor Narges Bajoghli of Johns Hopkins University suggests Iran's response is fueled by observations of Israel's ongoing military operations and occupation in the region
Trump's surprise Iranian airstrikes, approved amidst intense US political division over Iran policy, sparked immediate controversy. The President's call for peace with Iran, following the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, directly contradicts expert predictions of retaliation and jeopardizes ongoing diplomatic efforts. This bold move, part of his second term's foreign policy, raises significant questions about US-Iran relations and the future of regional stability
Trump's Iran Strikes: AIPAC, Military Leaders Backed Decision. Following the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) lauded the action as "historic and decisive," echoing Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's assessment of Iran's nuclear threat. This stance contrasts with U.S. intelligence and international consensus. Furthermore, influential figures within the Trump administration, including top military commanders in the Middle East, reportedly advocated for joint U.S.-Israel strikes against Iran for months prior
Trump's controversial Iran strikes: Top advisors like Steve Bannon warn against escalating US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, fearing a costly and unpredictable regional war. The decision risks derailing diplomatic efforts and provoking Iranian retaliation
Trump's Iran Strikes: Expert Warns of Unforeseen Consequences. A Stand Together VP criticizes the recent US airstrikes on Iran, highlighting the potential for devastating Iranian retaliation against American troops and the lack of consideration for long-term repercussions. The decision, announced by President Trump, risks escalating tensions and jeopardizing any chance of future diplomacy
Amid escalating US-Iran tensions, concerns rise over the safety of American personnel at Middle Eastern bases like At-Tanf, Syria, a potential Iranian target. The proximity of these bases to pro-Iranian militias near Iraq increases the risk of retaliation following recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites
Support HuffPost's 20-year legacy of fearless truth-seeking journalism. For two decades, we've delivered unwavering news coverage. Help us continue this vital mission for the next 20 years – your support makes it possible
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
Smith expressed some hope Trump will deem his strike “sufficient and successful” without further American involvement in the war, but noted the risk of what national security observers refer to as “mission creep.”
“Everybody knew this was the easy part. They wanted him to do the easy part because they knew once you’ve got a toe in the water, you’ve got a foot in the water and then you’re all the way in,” Smith said.
Source: Original Article