James Carville clashes with Fox News' Martha MacCallum over President Trump's potential military action against Iran. The Democratic strategist challenges Trump's decision-making, drawing parallels to the Iraq War and questioning the network's historical coverage of such conflicts. Carville highlights the Bush administration's false claims about WMDs, sparking a heated exchange with MacCallum and fellow panelist Clay Travis
James Carville confronts Fox News' Martha MacCallum, reminding her of the network's Iraq War coverage during a heated debate on President Trump's potential military action against Iran. Carville challenged MacCallum's line of questioning, citing the network's past promotion of the Iraq War based on false pretenses, highlighting the dangers of unchecked war-mongering and urging caution in the current situation
James Carville challenges Fox News' Iraq War coverage, reminding viewers of the network's 2002 pre-invasion reporting on WMDs. He points out the Bush administration's false claims as a reason to question current U.S. military action considerations. Carville highlights the significant parallels between the Iraq War justification and the current situation, emphasizing the importance of cautious decision-making
James Carville clashes with Martha MacCallum on Fox News over Iran, drawing parallels to the Iraq War. Carville challenges MacCallum's questioning, reminding viewers of Fox News' past coverage and the false claims leading to the Iraq invasion. He questions the current administration's credibility, sparking a heated exchange about the potential for another war
James Carville challenges Fox News' Iraq War reporting, citing government deception. He questions trusting the current administration after the profound lies surrounding the 2003 Iraq invasion, highlighting the network's role in promoting the war based on false claims of WMDs. Carville's skepticism underscores concerns about potential misinformation regarding current military actions
Fox News host Martha MacCallum clashed with James Carville over the potential for US military action against Iran. Carville, referencing the Iraq War, questioned the current administration's credibility. MacCallum countered by citing nuclear weapons expert David Albright, who argued the situation is "absolutely not Iraq." This sparked a heated exchange, highlighting differing perspectives on the potential conflict
James Carville rebuffs Fox News' war-mongering rhetoric, reminding viewers of the network's past role in promoting the Iraq War. He challenges the comparison to the current Iran situation, highlighting the Bush administration's false claims about weapons of mass destruction and emphasizing his skepticism towards the current administration's narrative
Fox News host Martha MacCallum denies war-mongering, claiming she's simply "reporting the facts" amidst James Carville's pointed criticism of President Trump's potential military action against Iran
OutKick founder Clay Travis joined the heated Fox News debate between James Carville and Martha MacCallum, interrupting Carville's response to MacCallum's challenge
James Carville expertly silenced Fox News host Martha MacCallum's interruption, retorting, "Excuse me for speaking while you're interrupting me," during a heated debate about the potential for US military action against Iran
Trump dismisses Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's March Senate testimony stating Iran isn't developing nuclear weapons, a claim echoing past controversies surrounding pretexts for war
James Carville challenges Trump's potential military action against Iran, demanding a clear rationale before initiating a war with 92 million people. He cites the Iraq War as a cautionary tale, questioning the administration's credibility after past misrepresentations regarding weapons of mass destruction. Carville emphasizes the need for thorough assessment and transparency before any military intervention
HuffPost: 20 Years of Unwavering Truth. Support independent journalism and help us continue delivering fearless reporting for the next 20 years. Your contribution keeps our investigative reporting alive
Unwavering commitment to factual reporting: delivering the truth you deserve
Your support fuels our independent journalism. We're incredibly grateful for your past contributions, which helped us navigate challenging times and remain a strong voice. Now, more than ever, we need your continued support to keep delivering vital news and analysis. Join us again and help us keep fighting for truth
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
“And that country has 92 million people, half have a college degree, half of those are women, and I just don’t think it’s a good idea to rush headlong into a war. I’m sorry. I was skeptical in 2002 and I’m skeptical in 2025.”
Carville: I’m old enough to remember in 2002 when this network was beating war drums as loud as you could beat war drums about WMDs— of course, it turned out to be a giant lie.
MacCallum: We just heard from an expert who said there’s so much evidence.
Carville: You are free to… pic.twitter.com/2iUX8Tncy0
Source: Original Article