Trump vs. Gabbard: President Trump again publicly contradicts Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon, claiming she is "wrong" and reiterating his assertion that Iran is weeks away from acquiring one. This marks the second time this week Trump has dismissed Gabbard's intelligence findings, sparking controversy and raising questions about conflicting intelligence reports on Iran's nuclear program
Trump clashes with intelligence community over Iran's nuclear program, claiming Iran is weeks away from completing a nuclear weapon despite conflicting assessments from his own Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. The President dismissed Gabbard's testimony to the Senate, reiterating his claim despite intelligence reports indicating otherwise. This public disagreement highlights a significant rift over Iran's nuclear capabilities
Trump dismisses Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran isn't building a nuclear weapon, claiming his intelligence community is wrong and questioning the source of Gabbard's statement. He insists Iran is weeks away from completing a nuclear weapon, contradicting the intelligence community's findings and echoing Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's claims. Gabbard's office attempts to downplay the disagreement, while Gabbard herself accuses the media of misrepresenting her testimony. This escalating dispute highlights the conflicting intelligence assessments regarding Iran's nuclear program
Trump dismisses Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran isn't building a nuclear weapon, contradicting her Senate testimony and claiming his intelligence community is wrong. This public disagreement follows previous statements where the President refuted Gabbard's analysis, despite her office attempting to downplay the conflict. The conflicting statements highlight the ongoing debate surrounding Iran's nuclear capabilities
Trump dismisses Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran isn't building a nuclear weapon, stating, "She's wrong." This contradicts the intelligence community's findings and aligns with Trump's claim that Iran is weeks away from completing a nuclear weapon
Trump contradicts Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's March Senate testimony, asserting Iran is weeks from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Gabbard stated the intelligence community assesses Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei hasn't authorized a nuclear program since its 2003 suspension. This disagreement highlights conflicting assessments regarding Iran's nuclear capabilities
Trump again publicly contradicts Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, dismissing her assessment that Iran isn't building a nuclear weapon. This marks the second time this week the President has publicly rejected Gabbard's intelligence findings, creating a high-profile disagreement over Iran's nuclear capabilities
Trump dismisses Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's testimony to the Senate, stating she's "wrong" about Iran's nuclear weapons program. He insists Iran is close to possessing a nuclear weapon, contradicting the intelligence community's assessment. Despite Gabbard's claim that Iran isn't currently building a nuclear weapon, Trump declares, "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having them." This aligns with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's stance on the imminent threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon
Trump's assertion that Iran is weeks away from a nuclear weapon aligns with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's justification for potential military action, emphasizing the imminent threat of an Iranian nuclear arsenal. This stance directly contradicts intelligence assessments, including those from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard
Despite President Trump publicly contradicting Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment on Iran's nuclear capabilities, Gabbard's office insists there's no disagreement, claiming both are "on the same page" regarding the Iranian nuclear threat
Trump vs. Gabbard: Contrasting Views on Iran's Nuclear Capabilities. A Gabbard spokesperson clarified that Iran's current inactivity on nuclear weapons development doesn't negate President Trump's assertion of their proximity to acquiring them
Following President Trump's criticism of her Senate testimony, Tulsi Gabbard accused the media of misrepresenting her statements on Iran's nuclear program, claiming her words were taken "out of context" and used to spread "fake news
Tulsi Gabbard accuses the media of misrepresenting her testimony on Iran's nuclear capabilities, claiming they spread fake news to sow division. She insists that US intelligence indicates Iran could produce a nuclear weapon within weeks or months, echoing President Trump's concerns and affirming her agreement with his stance against Iranian nuclear weapons development
Trump sidelines Gabbard amid Iran strike debate, dismissing her assessment that Iran isn't building nuclear weapons. The President's claim contradicts intelligence community findings, prompting further conflict with the Director of National Intelligence. Gabbard's exclusion from recent national security meetings regarding potential Iran strikes highlights the growing rift
Trump to Decide on Fordow Strike Within Two Weeks: President Trump will decide within the next fourteen days whether to launch a military strike against Fordow, Iran's main nuclear facility. This follows his dismissal of intelligence assessments that contradict his claim of Iran's imminent nuclear weapons capability
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
In his gaggle with reporters on Friday, he said two weeks is a “maximum” timeline for his decision.
“I’m giving them a period of time, we’re going to see what that period of time is,” he said.
Source: Original Article