Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard in Los Angeles. A federal appeals court ruled that President Trump lawfully deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles during immigration protests, overruling a lower court decision and upholding the President's authority to federalize state National Guard units in response to violent protests and threats to federal property. The decision cites significant evidence of protester violence as justification
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority Over National Guard Deployment to Los Angeles. A three-judge panel overturned a lower court ruling, finding President Trump likely acted lawfully in federalizing California National Guard troops during 2018 immigration protests, despite Governor Newsom's objections. The decision cites evidence of violent protests and damage to federal property as justification
Unprecedented Presidential Action: Appeals Court Upholds Trump's National Guard Deployment, First Since 1965
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority to Federalize National Guard in Los Angeles. A three-judge panel unanimously ruled President Trump likely acted lawfully in assuming control of the National Guard, rejecting a lower court's decision. The court cited violent protests and threats to federal officers and property as justification, finding the federal government's interest in preventing such incidents significant. This decision marks the first presidential deployment of a state National Guard without gubernatorial consent since 1965
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard: A three-judge panel ruled that President Trump likely acted lawfully in federalizing California's National Guard, citing evidence of violent protests and significant threats to federal interests. While presidential power over state National Guards isn't absolute, the court found the administration presented sufficient justification for its actions
Appeals court upholds President Trump's authority to deploy National Guard in Los Angeles, citing evidence of violent protests. Undisputed facts show protesters assaulted federal officers with concrete, bottles, and other projectiles, damaged federal buildings, and attacked a federal vehicle. The court deemed the federal government's interest in preventing such violence significant, justifying the deployment
Appeals court upholds President Trump's authority to federalize California National Guard, ruling Governor Newsom lacked power to veto the deployment despite potential notification failures. The decision clarifies presidential power over state National Guard units during civil unrest, citing justifiable reasons for federal intervention based on violent protests
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard, Labeling It a "BIG WIN." The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that President Trump lawfully deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles in 2018, overruling a lower court decision. The court cited violent protests and the need to protect federal officers and property as justification
President Trump's authority to deploy the National Guard without gubernatorial consent upheld by appeals court. The ruling cites violent protests and the federal government's responsibility to protect citizens when state and local law enforcement is overwhelmed. The court's decision emphasizes the president's role in providing national security and maintaining order across the United States
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority Over National Guard Deployment to Los Angeles: Governor Newsom expresses mixed reaction to the ruling, welcoming one aspect while expressing disappointment over Trump retaining control. The decision reverses a lower court ruling and allows the President to maintain federal control of the National Guard deployed during immigration protests
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority Over National Guard Deployment: Governor Newsom vows to continue legal challenge against the President's actions, arguing the President is not above the law and cannot unilaterally deploy National Guard troops without explanation or gubernatorial consent. The ruling reverses a lower court decision, finding the President's actions likely lawful given evidence of violent protests
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard: This landmark ruling impacts presidential power to deploy troops domestically. The decision, following Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles without the governor's consent, clarifies the president's authority in situations involving civil unrest and threats to federal assets. The court's analysis centers on the president's response to violent protests and the potential implications for future deployments of National Guard troops within US cities
Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles during immigration protests faced legal challenge. While Governor Newsom argued the move was an overreach of power, escalating tensions and wasting resources, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Trump's authority, citing evidence of violent protests and federal property damage. The court ruled the president acted lawfully in federalizing the National Guard to restore order, despite objections from the California governor
Appeals Court Upholds Trump's Authority Over National Guard Deployment: A three-judge panel, including two Trump appointees, ruled that the president likely acted lawfully in federalizing California's National Guard, citing widespread violence during protests. The court emphasized the president's broad authority and the need for judicial restraint in such matters
California Governor Newsom's lawsuit challenging President Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles without his consent was initially successful in a lower court. However, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling reversed this decision, upholding the President's authority to federalize National Guard troops in response to violent protests
Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of “rebellion or danger of a rebellion.”
“The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of ‘rebellion,’” wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.
The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can’t second guess the president’s decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.
Source: Original Article