Trump Administration Quietly Rolls Back Title IX Protections: Energy Department's Unusual Move Threatens Girls' School Sports. The Department of Energy is using an administrative loophole to weaken Title IX, potentially eliminating protections that allow girls to participate in boys' sports. This controversial rule change, bypassing the Education Department, aligns with the Trump administration's stance on sex and gender in sports, raising concerns among civil rights advocates. Learn how this unprecedented action could impact K-12 schools and universities nationwide
Title IX Under Attack: DOE Proposal Threatens Equal Athletic Opportunities for Girls. The Department of Energy seeks to eliminate Title IX protections ensuring equal sports access for underrepresented sexes, potentially barring girls from trying out for boys' teams when no equivalent girls' team exists. This controversial rule change, impacting K-12 and university athletic programs receiving DOE funding, aligns with the Trump administration's stance on sex and gender in sports
The Department of Energy's proposed rule change could significantly impact K-12 schools and universities. By rescinding a section of Title IX, this action threatens to limit athletic opportunities for underrepresented sexes in federally funded schools. While not the primary Title IX enforcer, the Department of Energy's funding for scientific research necessitates compliance with federal regulations, including this controversial amendment. This move affects schools receiving Energy Department funding and raises concerns about fairness and equal access in school athletics
Energy Department Reverses Title IX Athletic Rules, Citing Sex-Based Differences. The Trump administration's Department of Energy proposes a rule change, citing President Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes, male and female. This action aims to rescind Title IX provisions allowing for expanded athletic opportunities based on sex, impacting K-12 and university sports programs. The proposed rule aligns with the administration's policy opposing male participation in women's sports, prioritizing safety, fairness, and competitive equity
Trump Administration Reverses Title IX Protections, Restricting Transgender Women and Girls in Sports. This new Department of Energy rule, aligned with a Trump executive order, opposes male participation in women's sports, citing concerns about safety, fairness, dignity, and truth in competition. The policy change impacts K-12 schools and universities receiving federal funding, potentially setting a precedent for future Title IX revisions
Civil rights experts question the unusual, expedited rollback of Title IX protections by the Department of Energy. This controversial rule change, impacting school athletic opportunities, bypasses the Education Department, raising concerns about transparency and due process. The DOE's action, leveraging an administrative loophole, potentially sets a dangerous precedent for future regulatory changes
This expedited rulemaking by the Department of Energy, potentially circumventing administrative law, sets a concerning precedent for future White House actions. The swift rollback of Title IX protections regarding school athletic opportunities raises serious concerns about the administration's approach to civil rights
Energy Department's Title IX Rollback Threatens Civil Rights: Experts warn a new rule, quietly pushed through the Department of Energy, could dismantle crucial sex discrimination protections in schools, setting a dangerous precedent for nationwide civil rights. This move, exploiting an administrative loophole, jeopardizes athletic opportunities for underrepresented sexes and potentially impacts K-12 and university programs
Federal agencies must adhere to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) for rulemaking. This includes a 60-day public comment period following proposal publication, allowing public input before final rule issuance
The Trump administration's proposed Title IX changes, impacting school athletic opportunities, utilize a "direct final rule" (DFR) process. This expedited rulemaking, typically used for non-controversial updates, bypasses standard procedures. The DFR allows the Department of Energy to swiftly rescind Title IX provisions ensuring equitable athletic participation for underrepresented sexes, potentially setting a concerning precedent for future regulations
Title IX Rollback: July 15th Deadline Looms for Civil Rights Rule Change. The Department of Energy's proposed rule, amending decades-old Title IX protections for equal athletic opportunities, faces a July 15th effective date unless significant public opposition is submitted via the federal rulemaking website by Monday. This controversial change, impacting K-12 schools and universities, could redefine sex-based participation in school sports
Proposed Title IX changes spark controversy, potentially impacting transgender and cisgender female athletes. A new rule, spearheaded by the Department of Energy, could significantly alter athletic opportunities for girls and women in K-12 schools and universities, raising concerns about fairness and equal access. This non-trivial revision directly affects Title IX's mandate for expanding sports opportunities to underrepresented sexes
This rollback of Title IX protections perpetuates harmful stereotypes fueling the trans sports ban, undermining fairness and inclusion in school athletics
Trump administration quietly dismantles Title IX protections through the Department of Energy, bypassing the Education Department and halting thousands of civil rights investigations. This unusual move exploits an administrative loophole to rescind rules ensuring equal athletic opportunities for underrepresented sexes in federally funded schools, impacting K-12 and universities. The Department of Energy's action aligns with Trump's broader efforts to restrict transgender women and girls' participation in female sports
Trump administration quietly dismantles Title IX protections through the Department of Energy, bypassing oversight and potentially impacting school athletic opportunities for girls. This unusual move exploits an administrative loophole, raising concerns about transparency and fairness in federal rulemaking. Experts warn of overwhelming complexity and a lack of accountability in this swift rollback of civil rights
As much as Education Secretary Linda McMahon has promised to “fight on every front to protect women’s and girls’ sports,” experts said this rule change would do little to help those athletes. Already the Education Department has launched more than a dozen investigations into schools, athletic institutions and states that have allowed transgender girls to compete alongside cisgender girls.
“I’m scratching my head for the motivation behind [rescinding the rule] because they mention the ‘Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports’ executive order, but it won’t really apply in the vast majority of those cases because [the rule] only allows a person to participate in a sport of the other sex on two conditions,” James Nussbaum, an Indiana-based attorney focused on sports law told The Hill. “One, the school doesn’t already offer that sport for their sex, and two, they’re the ‘underrepresented sex’ historically, and that’s just not male sports at the vast majority of schools.”
The Energy Department’s rule on athletics is part of a bevy of 47 rule changes that have been proposed in an effort to save $11 billion and cut more than 125,000 words from the Code of Federal Regulations, the department said in a press release last month.
“While it would normally take years for the Department of Energy to remove just a handful of regulations, the Trump administration assembled a team working around the clock to reduce costs and deliver results for the American people in just over 110 days,” U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.
Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
For two decades, HuffPost has been fearless, unflinching, and relentless in pursuit of the truth. Support our mission to keep us around for the next 20 — we can’t do this without you.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
This isn’t the first time the Trump administration has tried to quietly and quickly push through a rule that could have sweeping impacts. In March, the Department of Health and Humans Services proposed a rule that would remove requirements that insurance providers cover gender-affirming care as essential care, which advocates warned could make care more expensive for trans adults and children alike.
In his first term Trump also rarely paid much mind to the Administrative Procedures Act, and tried to use the process to push through much of his anti-immigrant agenda. Beginning in 2017, Trump tried to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program several times, even though his team faced enormous pushback in the courts — and two-thirds of cases against Trump accused his administration of flaunting the APA.
Source: Original Article