Hegseth Sidesteps Greenland Invasion Questions: Pentagon's Plans Remain Unclear. Following President Trump's repeated calls to acquire Greenland, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth evaded direct questions from a Republican congressman regarding potential U.S. military action against the Danish territory. The exchange, during a House Armed Services Committee hearing, highlights ongoing debate surrounding U.S. intentions towards Greenland and its strategic importance
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces House Armed Services Committee questioning (June 12, 2025) over Greenland military plans. Hegseth deflected questions regarding potential U.S. military action in Greenland, amidst ongoing debate about the controversial Signal app and President Trump's past proposals. The hearing followed Denmark's approval of new US military bases
Defense Secretary Hegseth evades questions on potential Greenland invasion. During a House Armed Services Committee hearing, Rep. Mike Turner pressed Hegseth twice about Pentagon plans to forcefully acquire Greenland, prompting a non-committal response. Hegseth's refusal to directly address the question, following similar evasiveness regarding military plans for Greenland, fueled concerns amidst ongoing debate about U.S. military presence and geopolitical interests in the region
Pentagon's Greenland Contingency Plans: Hegseth Deflects Invasion Questions. Defense Secretary Hegseth sidestepped direct questions regarding potential US military action in Greenland, stating only that the Pentagon has plans for various contingencies. His response followed Congressman Turner's concerns about a possible invasion, prompting a clarification about securing Greenland from threats through collaboration
Hegseth, facing questions about potential U.S. military action in Greenland, assured Congressman Turner that the Pentagon's focus is on collaborative security. Responding to concerns about a forceful takeover, Hegseth stated that the U.S. aims to work with Greenland to protect it from threats, rejecting suggestions of invasion or military occupation
Hegseth's controversial use of Signal to discuss classified military plans sparked a Greenland debate during a House Armed Services Committee hearing. Questions arose regarding potential U.S. military action in Greenland, a topic previously raised by President Trump. The hearing highlighted Hegseth's refusal to directly address Congressman Turner's concerns about Pentagon plans for Greenland
Rep. Mike Turner intervened during a House Armed Services Committee hearing, offering Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth support after Hegseth repeatedly avoided directly answering questions about potential US military plans for Greenland. Hegseth's evasive responses, concerning a possible invasion or forceful takeover of Greenland, followed questioning by Rep. Adam Smith regarding Pentagon contingency plans. Turner's intervention aimed to clarify Hegseth's testimony, citing concerns about misinterpretations
Denmark approves US military bases, sparking concerns over Greenland annexation. The Danish Parliament's decision to allow new US bases fuels criticism that it emboldens previous attempts by the Trump administration to acquire Greenland
Trump's repeated proposals to purchase Greenland, including potential military action or economic coercion, have been firmly rejected by Greenland and Denmark. This Arctic territory's strategic importance is growing due to melting ice opening new shipping lanes, attracting interest from global rivals like Russia and China. The escalating geopolitical tensions surrounding Greenland highlight the complex relationship between the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland
Trump's Greenland Gambit: Why He Wants to Buy It & Denmark's Firm Rejection (Forbes)
Trump's Greenland Gambit: US Military Plans & Panama Canal Threat – Forbes
Source: Original Article