Steve Bannon's Hypocrisy: Palantir, Data Privacy, and the Democratic Party. Former Trump advisor Steve Bannon reveals his selective outrage over Palantir's data aggregation of US citizens for the federal government, admitting he'd be far more vocal if Democrats were in charge. This exposes hypocrisy surrounding privacy concerns and the role of technology in government surveillance. Bannon's criticism highlights the debate on data privacy, government overreach, and the political implications of Palantir's contracts with federal agencies
Trump's March executive order mandated sweeping federal data sharing, impacting agencies like the IRS, SSA, Education Department, and ICE, sparking privacy concerns. This data consolidation, highlighted by a May New York Times report, raises serious questions about government surveillance and personal data protection
Palantir's data-sharing practices with the US government raise serious privacy concerns. A recent report highlighted potential overreach of government surveillance powers, prompting Palantir to vehemently deny the allegations as "reckless and irresponsible," while asserting that civil liberties are core to their mission. This follows an executive order mandating increased data sharing across federal agencies, including the IRS, SSA, and ICE
Steve Bannon raises serious privacy concerns about Palantir's data integration across US federal agencies, a project spearheaded by the Trump administration. Bannon, appearing on "Sunday Night With Chuck Todd," expressed alarm over the scale of data consolidation, suggesting widespread public concern and highlighting a potential double standard, noting his stronger opposition if a Democratic administration were behind the initiative. His comments follow a New York Times report detailing the involvement of agencies like the IRS, Social Security Administration, and ICE, sparking debate about government surveillance and citizen privacy rights. Bannon's shift in stance, considering his past involvement with Cambridge Analytica, adds significant weight to the ongoing discussion surrounding Palantir, data privacy, and the implications of federal data sharing
Steve Bannon expresses outrage over Palantir's data-sharing with the federal government, claiming the MAGA base is unhappy and alleging the tech company is aligned with Democrats. His "War Room" podcast will reportedly heavily cover the privacy concerns surrounding this data aggregation, echoing concerns raised by civil liberties groups
Steve Bannon, a key figure in the Cambridge Analytica scandal involving the harvesting of millions of Facebook users' data to influence the 2016 election, now aligns with privacy advocates and civil liberties groups, expressing concerns about government data collection
Palantir, the data analytics firm co-founded by Peter Thiel, faces growing privacy concerns after receiving over $113 million in federal funding since January and a $795 million Department of Defense contract in May. This follows a New York Times report detailing the company's role in streamlining federal data, raising questions about government surveillance and citizen privacy
Trump's Executive Order: Streamlining Government Data & Sparking Privacy Debate. A White House spokesperson confirmed President Trump's executive order aimed at improving government efficiency and saving taxpayer money by eliminating data silos and enhancing inter-agency data sharing. This initiative, however, has raised significant privacy concerns regarding federal data collection and surveillance
Government data consolidation raises privacy concerns. Critics fear a centralized "master database" could be misused for surveillance and suppressing dissent, prompting calls for rejection. The claim of simply improving data access fails to alleviate these anxieties among social media users and privacy advocates
ACLU senior policy counsel Cody Venzke voiced similar concerns about government data collection and privacy in April
Former Trump advisor Steve Bannon raises alarm over a potential federal surveillance state, warning of a centralized database compiling all government-held data on US citizens. He fears this represents a significant step towards a panopticon-like system, echoing concerns about Palantir's role in consolidating this information
Palantir's massive federal data project raises serious privacy concerns. Internal sources express unease about the vulnerability of a centralized database, echoing fears voiced by Steve Bannon, who highlights potential risks to citizen data. This massive data aggregation, encompassing agencies like the IRS and ICE, fuels debate about government surveillance and individual privacy rights, despite Palantir's claims to prioritize civil liberties
Bannon calls Palantir "techno-feudalists," highlighting their focus on data networks over national interests, raising concerns about government surveillance and privacy in the age of big data
Source: Original Article